For many healthcare practitioners all over the world, it is a dream or necessity to migrate and practice in a country abroad–be it in search of better career opportunities or to achieve financial stability. Certain countries and their healthcare systems are regarded as key prospects, including Australia and the United Kingdom. However, migrating to a new country involves more than just selecting one at random. There are multiple factors to consider, from the systems and policies in place to the cultural environments of each country, which, for the most part, are markedly different. These differences have important consequences not only for individual migrants but also for each country’s healthcare workforce planning and service delivery.
To help you make your decision, this article will analyse and compare the differences in the healthcare systems in the UK and Australia. We shall examine critical factors such as exam costs, job opportunities, lifestyle quality, and financial outcomes.
1. Healthcare Systems and Professional Environment
UK: The UK’s National Health Service (NHS) is well renowned and regarded for providing universal, free-at-the-point-of-use care. It is frequently cited as one of the institutions that make citizens most proud to be British, as citizens can afford to visit the hospital without entering financial debt. For IMGs seeking greener pastures, the NHS offers extensive clinical exposure and a diverse patient population, which can be especially beneficial for building clinical acumen. However, the NHS struggles with several issues, including insufficient funding, staff shortages across all health professions, and a high backlog of patients seeking care. Healthcare practitioners often complain of having high workloads, long hours, and bureaucratic challenges that can contribute to stress and burnout.
Australia: Australia’s healthcare system is made up of a blend of public (Medicare) and private services. Medicare is publicly funded and is meant to serve all Australians, while the private clinics are for those who desire more coverage or private healthcare facilities. Doctors and nurses in Australia often benefit from a better work-life balance, with shorter workweeks and higher salaries. On the flip side, due to the country’s small size, there is fierce competition for placement spots due to the limited positions open, and the integration programs for internationally trained professionals are not nearly as developed as the NHS as it relies heavily on local bridging programs and individual support systems.
2. Exam
Before you make the decision on where you want to migrate to, you should consider the exams you’ll need to take to be declared competent to practice in your country of choice.
U.K: The UK uses the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) exam to assess your readiness to practice. It tests your understanding of medicine as well as your understanding of the peculiarities of British culture. PLAB consists of two parts and costs about £1,473 in total. However, there are other costs to consider, like registering for IELTS or OET (before the exam) and the General Medical Council (after the exam). PLAB 1 is held in select countries around the world, while PLAB 2 is held at the GMC clinical assessment centre in Manchester, and it takes place about four times a year. Keep in mind that securing your preferred dates depends on how early you apply.
Australia: The Australian Medical Council (AMC) exam evaluates the competence of IMGs for clinical practice in Australia. Like the PLAB, the AMC exam has two components, and both parts cost around AUD 8,150 (approximately £4,107). However, you’ll also need to factor in additional expenses, such as registering and preparing for an English proficiency test (IELTS or OET) before you take the AMC Part 1, as well as registration fees with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) once you pass the exams. AMC part 1 is offered year-round at select Pearson VUE test centres internationally. In contrast, part 2 is conducted only in Australia (primarily in Melbourne) and is held a few times a year. As with the PLAB exam, securing your preferred AMC exam dates—especially for the clinical assessment—depends on how early you apply, given that AMC Part 2 has limited sessions and slots available.
Both exams can be difficult to take. Luckily, there are resources that can be a great help to your efforts. CanadaQBank has comprehensive question banks for both parts of the PLAB exam and the Australian CAT exam that do a superb job of simplifying complex topics.
3. Professional Development and Training
UK Training Environment: The NHS is structured with clear training pathways. Junior doctors often gain extensive hands-on clinical experience early on, as they work in multiple specialities such as A&E and surgery under close supervision during foundational training. This setup, many argue, builds strong clinical instincts and “on-the-ground” decision-making skills early in their careers. Continuous professional development (CPD) courses, mentors, and research opportunities are also available to those who wish to increase their knowledge and broaden their horizons. However, the intense workload and resource limitations can sometimes negatively impact personal well‐being.
Australian Training Environment: In Australia, the pathway to consultant or specialist status involves less early clinical independence but rewards long-term commitment with higher earnings and a better balance between work and personal life. Furthermore, recognising that IMGs may struggle with adapting to a new culture and environment, the relevant Australian bodies introduced structured integration and bridging programs that help overseas-trained doctors and nurses adjust to local practices. Sadly, there are limited training positions, so competition is fierce.
4. Immigration and Regulatory Frameworks
UK Regulatory Processes: The UK requires IMGs to pass rigorous assessments and obtain registration through bodies like the General Medical Council (GMC) or the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). The established procedures provide a level of standardisation, though they can be lengthy and sometimes hinder rapid integration.
Australian Pathways: Australia has been proactive in addressing workforce shortages by streamlining immigration for medical professionals. Initiatives such as fast-track registration programs (especially for doctors from the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand) and country-specific bridging courses help expedite the process. However, these expedited pathways have raised concerns among professional bodies regarding the quality of those fast-tracked with little to no supervision.
5. Lifestyle and Quality of Life
UK Lifestyle: Living in the UK comes with perks; for example, the UK is a country rich in history and culture. Its proximity and connection to the rest of Europe allow you to travel through the continent to explore and vacation in European countries without needing to apply for multiple visas. However, many healthcare professionals report that high living costs (particularly in London) and a more stressful work environment can detract from overall quality of life. Doctors work an average of 48 hours per week, and a substantial part of their salary goes towards taxes and bills. For IMGs migrating from tropical/sub-tropical regions, they have to adjust to living with the typical British weather, the local cuisine, and British culture.
Australian Lifestyle: Australia is famed for its sunny climate, outdoor lifestyle, and overall excellent work-life balance. Many doctors and nurses report that even though the professional environment can be competitive, the flexible workweek makes Australia an attractive destination. It is not all rosy, as living in Australia can be relatively costly, especially in cities like Sydney and Melbourne. Thanks to the country’s smaller population, it can be difficult for migrant doctors to find and make friends with natives.
6. Financial Considerations
UK: The United Kingdom offers a modest salary for doctors and healthcare workers. The salary a doctor earns depends on their grade, level of training, and years of experience. Salaries range from £32,398 for doctors in foundation training to £104,085 for salaried GPs. There are allowances made for those who work overtime (more than 40 hours in a week) and those who work weekends.
Australia: In Australia, doctors earn well above the minimum wage. Salaries range from AUD 80,000 to AUD 207,000 per year but can be much higher for those with experience or in a specialised field.
7. Challenges
UK: The NHS and its staff are often understaffed, overworked, and underfunded. A recurring criticism the NHS faces is that patients usually face long waits for appointments, diagnostics, and elective procedures. There have been instances of patients being treated in suboptimal conditions such as “corridor care” or having to wait for months before they can access life-improving surgeries. The NHS is often criticised for its complex administrative processes and inefficient communication systems. Patients frequently report difficulties with appointment scheduling, chasing test results, or receiving delayed information.
Australia: Due to intense competition between doctors, there is a limited number of training positions available for both Australian-trained doctors and IMGs. This results in certain Australian cities being understaffed; health services face staffing challenges in serving remote areas, so new doctors are often given rural placements to make up for the lack. This can be an issue as the remote areas are teeming with wildlife that could get dangerous to those unfamiliar. Recent policies aimed at improving and easing the process of migrating doctors have generated concern among professional bodies who fear that it could lead to a decline in the quality of care provided.
Conclusion
Both Australia and the UK offer compelling—but distinct—environments for medical migrants. The UK’s long-established NHS provides an unmatched setting for gaining diverse clinical experience, while Australia’s robust incentives and favourable lifestyle offer higher earnings and a superior work-life balance. Nevertheless, each system has its challenges: the NHS struggles with resource constraints and workload pressures, and Australia faces concerns over training capacity, as well as integration issues.
Ultimately, the decision for a medical professional to migrate depends on individual priorities—whether one values the clinical depth of the NHS or the lifestyle and financial benefits available Down Under. Policymakers in both countries are continuously adjusting their strategies to balance domestic workforce needs with international recruitment, all while ensuring high standards of patient care and professional support.